CASA/CHILD
ADVOCACY CENTER PARTNERSHIP
The NYS Office of Children and Family Services and
The NYS Child Advocacy Resource and Consultation Center
The
CASA/CAC
Partnership Project is a collaborative effort between the New York
State Office
of Children and Families (NYS OCFS), CASA: Advocates for Children in
NYS
(CASANYS), the NYS Child Advocacy Resource and Consultation Center
(NYSCARCC),
and local CASA and CAC programs. The overall goal of the project is to
improve
the advocacy and reduce the trauma children experience when they are
victims of
sexual abuse. Funds supporting this project are used to facilitate
training of
and collaboration among professionals and volunteers involved in
permanency
planning and administration of justice for these child victims in New
York
State.
Funding to
support training and development have been provided to four CASA
programs in
the state to develop effective partnerships at the local level. CASAs,
CACs and
MDTs work with many of the same organizations in their communities and
are
likely to serve a number of the same children. Over 90% of the CASA
volunteers
at the partnership programs reported that they had handled at least one
case
involving the sexual abuse of a child that was either known or
suspected. Yet,
before this project began, CASAs and CACs and MDTs had not worked
together in
any formal capacity.
Grant funds
facilitated the development of agreements between CASAs and CAC/MDTs.
Partnership programs, with technical assistance from CASANYS, developed
and
finalized partnership agreements to coordinate communication and
management of
cases. Each program was careful to obtain the input of the different
legal,
social service and judicial personnel and/or agencies currently
involved in child
sexual abuse cases in order to ensure that the CASA/CAC partnership
would
complement, not duplicate, advocacy services available in each
community.
Partnership programs began referring cases to each other in March of
2002.
A
Permanency
& Justice Task Force (2003-2004) was formed as part of this
project,
reporting to the Children's Justice Task Force, to identify ways to
promote and
support training and collaboration among professionals and volunteers
involved
in permanency planning and administration of justice for child victims
in New
York State .
CASANYS has
continued to support these partnerships and has worked to promote
awareness and
collaboration throughout the state. CASANYS hosted a teleconference
training on
Male Child Sexual Abuse in October 2005 and contracted with a
consultant to
prepare an in-depth in-service training module on child sexual abuse
throughout
the network. Future funding will hopefully allow CASANYS to conduct
training
coinciding with the dissemination of this curriculum, to directly
support
additional local partnerships, and to further the work of existing
partnerships
in ways that strengthen the capacity of both organizations to assist
children
and families.
In the fall
of
2005 regional training seminars on child sexual abuse were held
throughout the
state. These events, jointly planned by local CASA and CAC programs,
were
attended by over 450 participants from CASA, OCFS, local DSS, law
enforcement,
mediation programs, the courts, mental health, domestic violence
programs, rape
crisis centers, voluntary agencies, and higher education.
CASA:
Advocates for Children in NYS, Inc., as part of the CASA/CAC
Partnership Project, has developed the following recommendations for
building effective partnerships between CASAs and CACs. These
recommendations are based on the experience and recommendations from
CASAs and CACs that have worked together both nationally and in New
York State:
1. There should be a written agreement that
identififes the overall goal of the partnership between the
organizations (i.e. reduce trauma, improve training)
2. Communication between programs must
be ongoing and partnership activities should be regularly reviewed to
ensure that they are supporting the mission of the partnership.
Agreements should require at least annual reviews of partnership
activities by both organizations.
3. The frequency, purpose and type of training
should be agreed to an annual basis.
4. If the programs are located in the same
building, communication and procedures must be in place to assure that
the victim is never in the building at the same time that the
perpetrator may be.
5. There must be a firm policy of complete
confidentiality of cases. Records can only be shared if there is a
signed release of information from the individual involved or if there
is a signed court order.
6. CASAs should not be involved in the actual
interview of the child at the CAC or by the MDT. If CASA is
assigned to a case that is still in the investigation stage at the CAC,
the CASA program director should consult with the CAC and/or MDT before
interviewing the child and/or the non-offending parent or alleged
perpetrator to ensure that a CASA interview will not interfere with the
criminal investigation of the case.
7. The agreement should specify if and when
CASA would be invited to MDT team meetings and what the purpose of CASA
participation should be.
8. The agreement should specify how case
referrals can be made to each
organization and how and when the programs will
report to each other about cases they share.
The
following is a case
example illustrating the benefits of the CASA/CAC Partnership:
The Broome
County CASA has been working on a
case involving a boy, currently age ten, for the past two years. When
CASA was
assigned to the case, the boy was living in an apartment with his
developmentally handicapped mother. The apartment condition was
deplorable:
sink stacked with dirty dishes, food strewn on the walls and floor,
cockroaches
everywhere, empty cupboards, and dirty laundry thrown on the floor. The
young
boy was also struggling in school. He would never return his homework,
and had
a difficult time grasping academic concepts. The mother rented the top
two
apartment units in her building and she slept in one apartment and her
son
slept in the apartment above her. She did so because there was only one
bedroom
in her apartment and she believed that her son was old enough to have
his own
room. Due to the repeated requests of the CASA volunteer and the facts
he
gathered, the child was removed from his mother's home in December
2001.
Since his
placement in foster care, the child is
thriving. He is maintaining straight A's in school and will be tested
for
accelerated classes. He has stopped wetting the bed and he is making
friends.
During the CASA's visit to the foster home he started to tell his CASA
worker
and his foster mother about things his mother and he used to do in bed
together. The CASA immediately alerted the DSS caseworker. She called
in a hot
line report and told the CASA to have the child keep a journal of his
feelings.
In March
2002, the CASA volunteer received a telephone call from
an intake supervisor at DSS asking him to meet the detective, the child
and DSS
at Crime Victims Assistance Center that day. The members of the
multi-disciplinary team invited the CASA volunteer because they thought
it
would help the child feel more safe and comfortable during the
interview
process. After meeting with the team members, the CASA volunteer met
with the
child and told him what was going to happen. A representative from CVAC
took
the CASA volunteer and the child on a tour of the building including
the
interview room. During the interview, the CASA sat in the waiting room.
After
the child was done he sat with the CASA and they talked and played
games while
everyone reviewed the tape. Based on the interview and the information
given by
the CASA and foster parent the mother was questioned and subsequently
arrested.
After the interview, the detective on the team said he felt the boy did
so well
precisely because of the CASA volunteer's presence.